Post by soyeb19 on Feb 18, 2024 4:49:08 GMT -5
The image shown corresponds to the first of the so-called Nuremberg Trials (November 1945 – October 1946), a judicial dispute initiated by the Allied nations that won the Second World War against twenty Nazi leaders. The processes made it possible to define three new types of crime: war of aggression (or conspiracy against peace), war crimes and crimes against humanity . The trial against the main Nazi leaders was followed by a dozen subsequent trials that, among other groups, affected judges and medical personnel.
The image falls within the genre of photojournalism . This type of photography seeks to document a situation, circumstance or reality that, in some way, is news. It is not intended to capture wonderful moments, convey a feeling or simply create an artistic image, but only to conceive images that serve to illustrate a newsworthy moment.
In the photo in question, the interest is focused on the defendant's dock , although the frame is large enough to provide us with relevant information about the characteristics of Whatsapp Database the room, the location of the defendants, as well as that of some of the staff. administrative and military who is present at the trial.
The image places us at the moment in which the Court proceeds to read the charges for which they are accused. From left to right, in the front row we can see: Hermann Goering , commander in chief of the Luftwaffe, Rudolf Hess , private secretary of Adolf Hitler, who, on a secret mission, flew to Great Britain and was captured in 1941 by the English allies, Joachim von Ribbentrop , Minister of Foreign Affairs, Wilhelm Keitel , head of the Wehrmacht High Command, Ernst Kaltenbrunner director of the Reich Central Security Department and Obergruppenführer of the SS; Back row: Karl Doenitz , grand admiral of the German fleet and successor to Adolf Hitler after his suicide , Erich Raeder , commander-in-chief of the German navy, Baldur von Schirach , leader of the Hitler Youth, Gauleiter and Reichsstatthalter of Vienna, and Fritz Saukel in charge of slave labor for the German war economy.
The image shows us the disdain, apathy and lack of signs of repentance with which the accused receive the charges. Relaxed and hieratic faces that focus the interest of their gaze on conflicting objectives. With this attitude they seem to show that the judgment is not with them, that they are just mere spectators of a foreign spectacle in which they are not even attributed a secondary role.
It would be said that his gestures reveal a certain disbelief, the unconscious denial of reality. This may be because perhaps they have not yet been able to come to terms with the fall of the Olympus of the Gods, the disappearance of the 1,000-year Reich. The dishonor and disgrace that have followed defeat .
His attitude may also be due to a fierce conviction in his innocence. In fact, during the trial their defense will be articulated around the idea that they were only limited to following orders , without judging in any way the ethical or moral consequences of their actions. The mandates relating to the torture and execution of human beings or the practice of evil acts were carried out without evaluating them, based on the respect and professionalism required by their position of hierarchical submission. Therefore, they do not recognize themselves in the description that prosecutors make of them, or their actions. All of this is very foreign to them, almost from a parallel reality. They consider themselves normal people who were simply responsible when it came to assuming the tasks entrusted to them. Hannah Arendt, in an extensive essay about the complexity of the human condition, called this attitude the “banality of evil.”
Finally, there is also a final interpretation regarding the behavior of the accused. The latter is more trivial and focuses on the fact that, knowing what the meaning of the sentence was going to be, they could not help but attend the trial with some tedium and commiseration, with the secret confidence that it would be brief and, As far as possible, painless.
By way of epilogue, it is appropriate to indicate that almost a year after the moment in which this seizure took place, the sentence ruled that Hermann Goering. Wilhem Frick, Alfred Jodl, Wilhem Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Alfred Rosenberg, Fritz Sauckel. Julius Streicher and Arthur Seyss Inquart were sentenced to death . Rudolf Hess was sentenced to life imprisonment and Baldur Von Schirach and Karl Dönitz to twenty and ten years of imprisonment respectively. Before the sentence was effective, Hermann Goering circumvented the entire control device, committing suicide in his cell by ingesting potassium cyanide.
The image falls within the genre of photojournalism . This type of photography seeks to document a situation, circumstance or reality that, in some way, is news. It is not intended to capture wonderful moments, convey a feeling or simply create an artistic image, but only to conceive images that serve to illustrate a newsworthy moment.
In the photo in question, the interest is focused on the defendant's dock , although the frame is large enough to provide us with relevant information about the characteristics of Whatsapp Database the room, the location of the defendants, as well as that of some of the staff. administrative and military who is present at the trial.
The image places us at the moment in which the Court proceeds to read the charges for which they are accused. From left to right, in the front row we can see: Hermann Goering , commander in chief of the Luftwaffe, Rudolf Hess , private secretary of Adolf Hitler, who, on a secret mission, flew to Great Britain and was captured in 1941 by the English allies, Joachim von Ribbentrop , Minister of Foreign Affairs, Wilhelm Keitel , head of the Wehrmacht High Command, Ernst Kaltenbrunner director of the Reich Central Security Department and Obergruppenführer of the SS; Back row: Karl Doenitz , grand admiral of the German fleet and successor to Adolf Hitler after his suicide , Erich Raeder , commander-in-chief of the German navy, Baldur von Schirach , leader of the Hitler Youth, Gauleiter and Reichsstatthalter of Vienna, and Fritz Saukel in charge of slave labor for the German war economy.
The image shows us the disdain, apathy and lack of signs of repentance with which the accused receive the charges. Relaxed and hieratic faces that focus the interest of their gaze on conflicting objectives. With this attitude they seem to show that the judgment is not with them, that they are just mere spectators of a foreign spectacle in which they are not even attributed a secondary role.
It would be said that his gestures reveal a certain disbelief, the unconscious denial of reality. This may be because perhaps they have not yet been able to come to terms with the fall of the Olympus of the Gods, the disappearance of the 1,000-year Reich. The dishonor and disgrace that have followed defeat .
His attitude may also be due to a fierce conviction in his innocence. In fact, during the trial their defense will be articulated around the idea that they were only limited to following orders , without judging in any way the ethical or moral consequences of their actions. The mandates relating to the torture and execution of human beings or the practice of evil acts were carried out without evaluating them, based on the respect and professionalism required by their position of hierarchical submission. Therefore, they do not recognize themselves in the description that prosecutors make of them, or their actions. All of this is very foreign to them, almost from a parallel reality. They consider themselves normal people who were simply responsible when it came to assuming the tasks entrusted to them. Hannah Arendt, in an extensive essay about the complexity of the human condition, called this attitude the “banality of evil.”
Finally, there is also a final interpretation regarding the behavior of the accused. The latter is more trivial and focuses on the fact that, knowing what the meaning of the sentence was going to be, they could not help but attend the trial with some tedium and commiseration, with the secret confidence that it would be brief and, As far as possible, painless.
By way of epilogue, it is appropriate to indicate that almost a year after the moment in which this seizure took place, the sentence ruled that Hermann Goering. Wilhem Frick, Alfred Jodl, Wilhem Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Alfred Rosenberg, Fritz Sauckel. Julius Streicher and Arthur Seyss Inquart were sentenced to death . Rudolf Hess was sentenced to life imprisonment and Baldur Von Schirach and Karl Dönitz to twenty and ten years of imprisonment respectively. Before the sentence was effective, Hermann Goering circumvented the entire control device, committing suicide in his cell by ingesting potassium cyanide.