Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 4:43:00 GMT -5
I have read several times Isabel Díaz Ayuso 's (IDA) speech at the Community of Madrid party on May 2. I highly doubt she wrote it. But, the unquestionable thing is that, if she has read it, it is because she assumes it. Everything is in state code. Mr. Feijóo , be careful. I have resisted writing about him several times, so as not to publicize him, which is ultimately what he intends. From the outset, I would describe it as spurious, shabby, rancid and that it takes us back to times of unfortunate memory in our history. Seriously, the Community of Madrid does not deserve it. My criticism of the speech is divided into two parts. The first is about that totally mendacious vision of the Community of Madrid, if we look at the current IDA policies. The second, about a conception of history, which could be framed within the most genuine national-Catholicism, which the military taught us during the Franco regime in that unfortunate subject of Formation of the National Spirit. It is surprising that Madrid universities and their contemporary history departments have not come out in force to deny such hoaxes, which in addition to being an insult to intelligence go against serious and scientific historiography.
This silence from the university is very suspicious. Do you fear any reprisals at the budget level from the Community? However, Spanish universities have long since largely lost their essence, that of representing the critical sense. Some words struck me from the start, full of deep ideological significance. What level! A true revolution in political ideas. They are like this: “ Today, the year 2022, Madrid, once again, is the Spain with desire, with the will to be more and to be better: more and better Spain; more and better Australia Phone Number Europe; more and better Latin America . I have read and reflected on them several times. What do they really mean? Do you want to be more and better? Awesome. Reading it reminded me of the German linguist Uwe Poerksen in his 1988 book Plastic Words: The Tyranny of a Modular Language , where he documented how the tyranny of a modular language made up of what he calls words was imposed on vernacular (common) speech. plastics. Hollow, empty, plastic words, without substance that have been altered in their meaning and impoverished in their content to be used as simple assembly modules that fit any discourse, story, need, problem solution or justification of an outrage.
They are semantic contortions to hide and distort the political, social and economic facts of any society. When our political class uses and abuses those plastic words, do they really know what they are saying? I'm afraid not. And then why do they use them? Because they know that no one is going to discuss them. Who is going to be against development, modernization, growth, progress, democracy...? Who is going to be against more and better Spain; more and better Europe; more and better Latin America ? I don't. I point out some adjectives extracted from the speech: Madrid is an open, supportive Spain, a welcoming land , the Spain of all, which is not drowned in identities, welcoming, understanding, plural and universal, which refuses ideological confrontation , a Spain of everyone, and whoever wants tolerance should look to Madrid . All these unambiguous words are a sample of cynicism, hypocrisy and shamelessness. How do you combine the fact that your Madrid is open, a welcoming land for all, with your recent words in Castilla y León about Socialismo free (free of socialism)? Or socialism or freedom in the Community of Madrid? Such a message is not something anecdotal, since it seeks to install in the environment the idea of the extirpation of the other for thinking differently. During the Third Reich, the Nazis coined the expression Judenfrei (free of Jews) for certain territories.
This silence from the university is very suspicious. Do you fear any reprisals at the budget level from the Community? However, Spanish universities have long since largely lost their essence, that of representing the critical sense. Some words struck me from the start, full of deep ideological significance. What level! A true revolution in political ideas. They are like this: “ Today, the year 2022, Madrid, once again, is the Spain with desire, with the will to be more and to be better: more and better Spain; more and better Australia Phone Number Europe; more and better Latin America . I have read and reflected on them several times. What do they really mean? Do you want to be more and better? Awesome. Reading it reminded me of the German linguist Uwe Poerksen in his 1988 book Plastic Words: The Tyranny of a Modular Language , where he documented how the tyranny of a modular language made up of what he calls words was imposed on vernacular (common) speech. plastics. Hollow, empty, plastic words, without substance that have been altered in their meaning and impoverished in their content to be used as simple assembly modules that fit any discourse, story, need, problem solution or justification of an outrage.
They are semantic contortions to hide and distort the political, social and economic facts of any society. When our political class uses and abuses those plastic words, do they really know what they are saying? I'm afraid not. And then why do they use them? Because they know that no one is going to discuss them. Who is going to be against development, modernization, growth, progress, democracy...? Who is going to be against more and better Spain; more and better Europe; more and better Latin America ? I don't. I point out some adjectives extracted from the speech: Madrid is an open, supportive Spain, a welcoming land , the Spain of all, which is not drowned in identities, welcoming, understanding, plural and universal, which refuses ideological confrontation , a Spain of everyone, and whoever wants tolerance should look to Madrid . All these unambiguous words are a sample of cynicism, hypocrisy and shamelessness. How do you combine the fact that your Madrid is open, a welcoming land for all, with your recent words in Castilla y León about Socialismo free (free of socialism)? Or socialism or freedom in the Community of Madrid? Such a message is not something anecdotal, since it seeks to install in the environment the idea of the extirpation of the other for thinking differently. During the Third Reich, the Nazis coined the expression Judenfrei (free of Jews) for certain territories.