Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 4:29:39 GMT -5
Yung people in the 21st century when, in reality, the real villain is the way people relate to these technologies . “The role of education has always been – and always will be – important, and in a timeless way, in terms of putting society’s feet on the ground in relation to how to view any and all types of tools that appear on this planet.” She explains that no tool is intrinsically good or bad, this will be defined by the way human beings relate to it and it is the teacher's job to guide people towards a positive relationship. The teacher calls our social context “cyberculture” and, therefore, we connect and relate through new media and it is essential to become literate and adapt in these media. “If educators do not embrace the mission of making individuals become literate in this new context, and build themselves in this new context, we may in fact have increasingly serious social and family problems.” She explains how this is linked to the dangers of fake news , “we think – or thought – that fake news is like gossip from the neighbor, from school”, but the internet allows this “gossip” to spread in a way that makes it dangerous , there are even companies that “work to promote fake news and destroy systems.
Being literate allows you to become a citizen of this cyberculture , to create a filter for fake news, for example. “It goes far beyond stopping writing on paper to typing on your cell phone.” Finally, the teacher concluded: “being aware of the extent to which sharing information, or making it available, replicating, passing on, is a social responsibility, is something that is perhaps one of the greatest challenges for educators in the 21st century.” The Prof. Leonardo Abreu comments in the chat that “ awakening and stimulating critical sense is essential. at all levels of education and in educators as well.” In relation USA Phone Number to this, Prof. Alexander talks about how a student watching a video or documentary during a class, listening to the teacher's comments, is different from watching it alone at home, precisely because of this encouragement of a critical view. Professor Danielle agrees and emphasizes how cartoons, for example, already have extraordinary contributions.
Series like Irmão do Jorel, The Amazing World of Gumball or Adventure Time have a large amount of social criticism that not only can go unnoticed, but are great resources to work on during classes. The Prof. Pandolfo highlights the importance of letting students reach their own conclusions , “letting the student rack their brains”. He uses Wikipedia as an example, hated by many teachers for having wrong information, and talks about how great it is that it has so much wrong information, as this allows the student to compare this information. He also reflects on the benefits of letting students research and debate a subject without initial influence from the teacher, how this allows them to reflect on this subject, “ we need to develop skills and abilities so that they can be critical. ” He explains that the world is going through changes, so it is impossible to predict the profession of students, “the professions that our high school students will occupy do not even exist yet”, which is why it is so important to focus on teaching critical thinking.
Being literate allows you to become a citizen of this cyberculture , to create a filter for fake news, for example. “It goes far beyond stopping writing on paper to typing on your cell phone.” Finally, the teacher concluded: “being aware of the extent to which sharing information, or making it available, replicating, passing on, is a social responsibility, is something that is perhaps one of the greatest challenges for educators in the 21st century.” The Prof. Leonardo Abreu comments in the chat that “ awakening and stimulating critical sense is essential. at all levels of education and in educators as well.” In relation USA Phone Number to this, Prof. Alexander talks about how a student watching a video or documentary during a class, listening to the teacher's comments, is different from watching it alone at home, precisely because of this encouragement of a critical view. Professor Danielle agrees and emphasizes how cartoons, for example, already have extraordinary contributions.
Series like Irmão do Jorel, The Amazing World of Gumball or Adventure Time have a large amount of social criticism that not only can go unnoticed, but are great resources to work on during classes. The Prof. Pandolfo highlights the importance of letting students reach their own conclusions , “letting the student rack their brains”. He uses Wikipedia as an example, hated by many teachers for having wrong information, and talks about how great it is that it has so much wrong information, as this allows the student to compare this information. He also reflects on the benefits of letting students research and debate a subject without initial influence from the teacher, how this allows them to reflect on this subject, “ we need to develop skills and abilities so that they can be critical. ” He explains that the world is going through changes, so it is impossible to predict the profession of students, “the professions that our high school students will occupy do not even exist yet”, which is why it is so important to focus on teaching critical thinking.